AGMs: a unique selling point for investment trusts

(Image credit: Getty Images)

published 16 June 2025

MoneyWeek is not dogmatic about how we invest. Passive funds, active funds, UK stocks, international stocks – all these and more should be on the table. Still, we tend to have a bias towards investment trusts rather than open-ended funds in our funds coverage. This is partly because investment trusts get a lot less attention than open-ended funds, and we can add more value by focusing on them, but also because we feel that there are certain structural benefits to closed-end funds for many types of investing.

Some of the supposed advantages of trusts are less compelling for me than other investors think. Yes, it’s great to be able to buy at a temporary discount to net asset value (NAV), but it’s less compelling if discounts are still wide when you sell. The issue of persistent discounts has become an existential issue for the sector (see chart). The ability to use gearing (borrowing to invest) can boost returns in principle, but gearing plus poor management equals bigger losses.

Closed-end structures are unequivocally best for alternative assets and for more illiquid markets. For highly liquid assets – eg, large-cap, developed-markets stocks – there’s less advantage. For example, earlier this month I met with the Guinness European Equity Income Fund – a quality-income fund with a solid record and a clear process. Even though I usually favour trusts, I’d be happy to choose it as a Europe fund. Or take STS Global Income & Growth Trust (LSE: STS), whose managers run the same portfolio in the open-ended Trojan Global Income Fund. I’d probably buy the trust, but I’d view the open-ended fund as an equally good choice for a defensive equity fund with low US exposure.

Subscribe to MoneyWeek

Subscribe to MoneyWeek today and get your first six magazine issues absolutely FREE

Get 6 issues free

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/mw70aro6gl1676370748.jpg

Sign up to Money Morning

Don't miss the latest investment and personal finances news, market analysis, plus money-saving tips with our free twice-daily newsletter

Still, there is one structural benefit of trusts that is often overlooked. An open-ended fund is controlled by the fund manager. An investment trust is an independent entity. It has its own board, which is supposed to look out for shareholders, and can sack the manager if they are doing a bad job (some boards are much diligent than others). So, like all companies, they must hold annual general meetings, where investors get an update from the manager. If you go to these, you will often hear plenty of excellent questions from very engaged investors who have their own money on the line.

Encouragingly, many trusts clearly see that AGMs are a chance to present themselves to potential investors, and not just a regulatory requirement. Recently I was at the AGM for India Capital Growth Fund (LSE: IGC), one of MoneyWeek’s favourite long-term plays on India. It previously held its meetings in Guernsey, but shifted to London and saw a strong turnout. This week, I should be at the Vietnam Enterprise Investments (LSE: VEIL) forum at its AGM (you can register to attend here). In an environment where many trusts will face a growing threat from active ETFs (which will not be holding AGMs), this is a unique selling point that more should capitalise on.

Cris Sholto Heaton is an investment analyst and writer who has been contributing to MoneyWeek since 2006 and was managing editor of the magazine between 2016 and 2018. He is especially interested in international investing, believing many investors still focus too much on their home markets and that it pays to take advantage of all the opportunities the world offers. He often writes about Asian equities, international income and global asset allocation.

Cris began his career in financial services consultancy at PwC and Lane Clark & Peacock, before an abrupt change of direction into oil, gas and energy at Petroleum Economist and Platts and subsequently into investment research and writing. In addition to his articles for MoneyWeek, he also works with a number of asset managers, consultancies and financial information providers.

He holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation and the Investment Management Certificate, as well as degrees in finance and mathematics. He has also studied acting, film-making and photography, and strongly suspects that an awareness of what makes a compelling story is just as important for understanding markets as any amount of qualifications.